.avif)
When your API handles sensitive data or operates in a regulated industry, hosting your documentation and SDK generation tooling in the cloud can create compliance headaches. Healthcare providers subject to HIPAA, financial institutions under SOC 2, and government contractors all face the same challenge: they need modern developer tools, but can't send their API specifications and schemas to third-party cloud services. Self-hosting solves this problem by keeping your entire tech stack under your control.
TLDR:
- Self-hosted infrastructure keeps data within the network perimeter, allowing deployment of custom security protocols and air-gapped networks for sensitive workloads.
- Regulatory frameworks like CMMC, HIPAA, and GDPR often require physical control over data location and processing, which self-hosting satisfies directly.
- Fern is the only docs and SDK generator that can be hosted on-prem so defense, government, and national intelligence customers can use Fern's products for their APIs.
- Self-hosting keeps API specifications within your network while still delivering quality SDKs and documentation to developers.
- Direct hardware control allows finer performance tuning, including dedicated CPU for SDK generation, optimized caching for search, and low-latency storage for frequently accessed API specs.
Self-hosted infrastructure security advantages
Self-hosting keeps your API specifications, documentation, and generated code within your network perimeter. There's no external data transmission to a vendor's servers, which means you control who accesses your API schemas, how they're encrypted in transit and at rest, and what appears in your audit logs.
On-premises deployments support security configurations that cloud-hosted environments can't accommodate. You can deploy custom intrusion detection tailored to your specific threat model rather than relying on a vendor's generic monitoring, and implement hardware-level encryption for the servers processing your API definitions and generating SDKs.
Air-gapped environments present a particular challenge for documentation. These networks have zero internet connectivity by design, which traditionally meant choosing between security and developer experience—accept the air-gap and settle for static PDFs, or compromise on network isolation. Self-hosted documentation platforms eliminate this trade-off by packaging docs as self-contained deployments with interactive features, SDK code snippets, search, and customizable branding—all running without external dependencies.
Self-hosting also simplifies compliance audits. When auditors ask where your API documentation lives or who can access your SDK generation pipeline, you can point to specific servers in your data center. You're not explaining a vendor's security controls or waiting for their SOC 2 report—you're showing your own infrastructure.
The trade-off is operational: you're responsible for patching, monitoring, and incident response. But for organizations with established security operations teams, direct control over the entire stack is worth the overhead.
Enterprise data governance requirements
Data governance isn't just about security—it's about proving to regulators and auditors that you know exactly where your data lives, how it moves through your systems, and who can access it. For developer tools, internal platforms, and business applications, this means accounting for every piece of sensitive information that flows through your tech stack.
Self-hosted infrastructure helps meet specific regulatory requirements that are difficult or impossible to satisfy with cloud-hosted tools:
- Data residency mandates: Regulations like GDPR require certain data to stay within specific geographic boundaries. With self-hosting, you control exactly which data center processes your information—no relying on a vendor's regional availability.
- Right-to-deletion: When a customer exercises their right to be forgotten, you need to delete their data from all systems and backups. Self-hosting means you can execute deletions directly rather than submitting tickets to a vendor and trusting their timeline.
- Audit trails: Compliance frameworks require detailed records of who accessed what data and when. Self-hosted systems give you complete logs without gaps from vendor infrastructure you can't inspect.
For organizations subject to HIPAA, PCI DSS, or SOC 2, self-hosting simplifies the compliance story. You're not explaining a cloud vendor's shared responsibility model or including their infrastructure in your audit scope. When your API documentation contains healthcare data or your SDK examples include payment flows, keeping everything on-premises means one less third-party risk assessment.
Government and defense contractor self-hosting mandates
Government agencies and defense contractors face compliance requirements that make self-hosted infrastructure non-negotiable. These aren't recommendations—they're contract terms and federal regulations with teeth.
Contractors handling Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) must meet all 110 security requirements outlined in NIST SP 800-171 R2. The Department of Defense enforces this through its Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) framework, which requires third-party assessment before contract awards. As of 2024, CMMC compliance is mandatory, and prime contractors must verify that their entire supply chain—including subcontractors—meets appropriate certification levels.
Cloud environments struggle with these requirements because CUI demands physical and logical separation that shared infrastructure can't guarantee. FedRAMP High authorization exists but involves lengthy approval processes and restricts which cloud regions and services organizations you can use. Even with authorization, you're still explaining a vendor's controls to auditors rather than your own.
Self-hosting solves this by giving you direct control over where CUI resides and how it's protected. When DoD auditors ask about your zero-trust architecture—verification of every access decision, documentation of data flows, clear system boundaries—you can show them your infrastructure, your logs, your controls. Owning infrastructure simplifies evidence collection for auditors.
Self-hosted SDKs and documentation solutions
API specifications often contain sensitive information—internal service architectures, authentication schemes, rate limiting rules, or references to proprietary business logic. When those specs flow through a cloud-hosted documentation or SDK generation platform, they leave your network perimeter.
Self-hosting these tools means running SDK generation and documentation builds on your own servers. Your OpenAPI specifications never leave your infrastructure, generated code stays within your CI/CD pipeline, and your documentation site runs on servers you control.
Fern offers self-hosted deployment options for both SDK generation and documentation. SDK generation runs through the CLI in your CI/CD pipeline, keeping API specifications within your build environment. For documentation, Fern generates Docker images that package your docs site as a self-contained deployment that works in completely air-gapped networks.
You can generate SDKs in any language directly within your build environment, and deploy Fern Docs to your private servers while keeping features like auto-generated API references, interactive examples, and AI chat. Your API specs stay on-premises, but your developers still get the experience of a modern documentation platform.
Not all developer tooling vendors offer true self-hosted deployments. Stainless and Speakeasy are built primarily as managed cloud services with limited on-premises options, which can be a dealbreaker for organizations with strict compliance requirements.
Self-hosting does come with operational overhead. Cloud-hosted solutions handle infrastructure scaling, monitoring, and updates automatically. With self-hosted deployments, you're responsible for keeping documentation sites available, managing search indexes, and applying updates when new versions release. You'll need infrastructure resources and someone to maintain them.
For organizations under regulatory mandates—HIPAA, CMMC, or data residency requirements—this isn't a choice. The operational overhead is the cost of keeping your API specifications and internal documentation within your controlled environment. The question isn't whether to self-host, but which tools make it feasible without sacrificing developer experience.
Cost-effectiveness and long-term value
Self-hosting shifts spending from recurring subscription fees to upfront infrastructure investment. Cloud services charge per API call, user seat, or compute unit, creating costs that grow with usage. On-premises deployments involve hardware purchases, setup labor, and maintenance, but eliminate per-transaction fees.
Cost predictability improves with self-hosted infrastructure. The hardware depreciation schedule, power costs, and staffing requirements are known years in advance. Cloud bills fluctuate with usage spikes, product launches, or unexpected traffic patterns. Finance teams prefer fixed operating costs when budgeting for multi-year tech roadmaps.
The break-even point depends on your scale. Small teams with modest API documentation needs often find cloud hosting more economical because they avoid hiring dedicated infrastructure staff.
Control and customization benefits
Self-hosted deployments allow performance tuning, scheduled uptime windows, and resource allocation based on actual workload patterns rather than shared infrastructure constraints.
Vendor lock-in risk drops when you own the deployment. Cloud providers may change pricing, deprecate features, or modify service terms with limited notice. Self-hosting makes it possible to switch infrastructure vendors, migrate between data centers, or adjust the technology stack without renegotiating contracts or re-architecting applications built on proprietary APIs.
Performance optimization becomes more granular with direct hardware management. Dedicated CPU cores can be allocated to SDK generation jobs, memory caching strategies can be configured for documentation search indexes, and low-latency storage can be deployed for API specifications that require frequent access.
Uptime control enables maintenance windows to be scheduled around your business cycles instead of following a vendor's timetable. You decide when to apply patches, update services, or perform infrastructure changes.
Making self-hosting work
Self-hosting requires infrastructure expertise that many teams underestimate. You need to configure servers, manage network security, implement backups, and handle incidents. If you don't have dedicated infrastructure staff, this is a significant lift.
The good news: modern tooling has made self-hosting more accessible than it was five years ago. Infrastructure-as-code tools like Terraform and Ansible automate deployment and reduce manual configuration errors. Containerization with Docker or Kubernetes simplifies updates and scaling. Monitoring tools give you visibility without building custom dashboards from scratch.
For teams without deep infrastructure experience, a few strategies help:
- Start small: Self-host your most sensitive workloads first (API specs, internal docs) while keeping less critical systems in the cloud. This reduces the infrastructure footprint you need to manage.
- Leverage existing infrastructure: If you already run on-prem databases or internal applications, adding documentation and SDK generation to that environment is incremental work, not a wholesale shift.
- Use managed infrastructure partners: Colocation providers and managed hosting services can handle the physical infrastructure (power, cooling, redundancy) while you focus on the application layer.
Self-hosting isn't trivial, but for organizations with compliance requirements, it's a solved problem. The infrastructure challenges are manageable—the regulatory penalties for non-compliance aren't.
Final thoughts on self-hosting for enterprise teams
Self-hosting isn't the right choice for every organization, but for those under strict regulatory requirements—HIPAA, CMMC, GDPR—it's often the only choice. The infrastructure overhead is real, but when compliance failures mean lost contracts or regulatory penalties, that overhead is the cost of doing business.
Modern self-hosted solutions let you meet compliance requirements without sacrificing developer experience. You keep API specifications and documentation within your network perimeter while still delivering auto-generated SDKs, interactive docs, and the features your teams expect from cloud platforms.
FAQ
What is the main security advantage of self-hosted infrastructure?
Self-hosted infrastructure keeps your data within your network perimeter, giving you direct control over access points, encryption methods, and audit trails without depending on a vendor's security posture. You can deploy custom intrusion detection systems, enforce hardware-level encryption, and maintain air-gapped networks for sensitive workloads.
What is the break-even point for self-hosting versus cloud services?
The break-even point depends on your scale and staffing capabilities. Small teams with modest API documentation needs often find cloud hosting more economical because they avoid hiring dedicated infrastructure staff, while larger organizations with high-volume API operations and existing infrastructure expertise typically see cost savings from eliminating per-transaction fees and gaining predictable fixed operating costs.
How does Fern's self-hosted deployment differ from Stainless and Speakeasy?
Fern provides full self-hosted deployment options that let you run SDK generation and documentation sites on your own servers, keeping API specifications within your network perimeter. Stainless and Speakeasy are oriented toward managed cloud models with limited self-hosting support, making Fern the stronger choice for teams with strict compliance or data governance requirements.
What are the biggest implementation challenges with self-hosting?
Infrastructure expertise requirements often exceed initial estimates. Your team needs 24/7 server management, network security, backup procedures, and incident response capabilities.
Can I use a hybrid approach instead of fully self-hosted infrastructure?
Yes, hybrid deployments let you keep highly sensitive data on-premises while using cloud services for less critical workloads. This reduces the scope of infrastructure you need to manage while maintaining control over regulated data, making it a practical middle ground for organizations with limited internal expertise.
